Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 24 reviews
Firestone WeatherGrip vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 24 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i cept evo2 SUV leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +469Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 64 69 WeatherGrip: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of dry for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Level70Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 70 69 WeatherGrip: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 68.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
75
Snow
WeatherGrip +273Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 77 71 WeatherGrip: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 75
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 71.4 = 73
No road tests of snow for WeatherGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
65
Comfort
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +368Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 62 65 WeatherGrip: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.4 = 65
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 40% × 72.3 + 60% × 64.9 = 68
No road tests of comfort for WeatherGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +169Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 69 ≈ 67 (est.) WeatherGrip: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for WeatherGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +1166Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 55 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 54 67 WeatherGrip: 60% × 55.2 + 40% × 53.7 = 55
Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Winter i cept evo2 SUV +567Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Reviews found online 62 67 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison61Why this score
Source WeatherGrip Winter i cept evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone WeatherGrip | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 65 | 69 |
| Wet | 70 | 70 |
| Snow | 75 | 73 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | 68 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 67 |
| Efficiency | – | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
WeatherGrip
Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | WeatherGrip | Winter i cept evo2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | #6/11 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A WeatherGrip
Pros
- Outstanding snow and winter weather traction
- Confident wet weather and rain grip
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear due to the softer rubber compound
- Noticeable drop in fuel economy (MPG)
- Subpar dry pavement performance compared to dedicated summer or standard all-season tires
Tire B Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone WeatherGrip | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Weather | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 15″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone WeatherGrip
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Narrow edge: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Where the Firestone WeatherGrip is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 66 vs 55 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 69 vs 65 on dry.
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, WeatherGrip or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?
Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 66 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology