Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 17 reviews
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 17 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winterforce 2 UV and Winter i*pike RS2 are level at 68.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Winterforce 2 UV +1056Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 64 67 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.4 + 40% × 66.5 = 56
No road tests of dry for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Winter i*pike RS2 +273Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 71 76 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 75.9 = 73
No road tests of wet for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Snow
Winter i*pike RS2 +376Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 74 77 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 76 + 40% × 76.9 = 76
No road tests of snow for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
62
Comfort
Winter i*pike RS2 +1173Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 58 68 Winterforce 2 UV: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62
Winter i*pike RS2: 40% × 80.7 + 60% × 68.2 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Winterforce 2 UV +359Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 55 ≈ 67 (est.) Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 62
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 59
No road tests of noise for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Winter i*pike RS2 +971Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 59 75 Winterforce 2 UV: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Winterforce 2 UV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison73Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online – 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source Winterforce 2 UV Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 68 |
| Dry | 66 | 56 |
| Wet | 71 | 73 |
| Snow | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 62 | 73 |
| Noise | 62 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winterforce 2 UV
Winter i*pike RS2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Winterforce 2 UV | Winter i*pike RS2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | #6/8 2023 Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winterforce 2 UV
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Winter i*pike RS2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
- Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
- High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years
Cons
- Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Winterforce 2 UV | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter tire | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 30 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Too close to call: Firestone Winterforce 2 UV and Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 are within 2 points overall. Firestone Winterforce 2 UV is stronger on dry and noise. Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 is stronger on comfort, treadwear and snow. Firestone Winterforce 2 UV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 66 vs 56 on dry.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV scores 62 vs 59 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Which is better in the wet, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV, 66 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Firestone Winterforce 2 UV, 62 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 73 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winterforce 2 UV or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology