Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 20 + 5 road tests and 6 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

WinterCraft WP52 plus is ahead, 79–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Winterhawk 4
Tire AFirestone

Winterhawk 4

Winter

± 5

Tests 68 · 20 tests Owners 60 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
± 5

Tests 78 · 5 tests Owners 81 · 6 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, Winterhawk 4 won 0 and WinterCraft WP52 plus won 3 (average 86% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, Winterhawk 4 won 3 and WinterCraft WP52 plus won 0 (average 98% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 49

    Dry

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +33
    82
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 4 tests4582
    Reviews found online5683
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–291%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–297%99%

    Winterhawk 4: 60% × 45.2 + 40% × 55.7 = 49

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 83.2 = 82

  2. 79

    Wet

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +9
    88
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 5 tests9090
    Reviews found online6387
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–180%86%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–386%91%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%96%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–295%97%

    Winterhawk 4: 60% × 89.8 + 40% × 62.8 = 79

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 89.5 + 40% × 86.5 = 88

  3. 73

    Snow

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 5 tests8075
    Reviews found online6279
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–098%97%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–098%95%

    Winterhawk 4: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 62.3 = 73

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 78.8 = 76

  4. 59

    Comfort

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +18
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 2 tests5974
    Reviews found online5979
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–185%91%

    Winterhawk 4: 40% × 58.9 + 60% × 58.7 = 59

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 40% × 73.6 + 60% × 78.9 = 77

  5. 76

    Noise

    Winterhawk 4 +14
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 3 tests8259
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–198%98%

    Winterhawk 4: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 59 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 4 tests5774
    Reviews found online6075
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–186%88%

    Winterhawk 4: 60% × 56.5 + 40% × 60.4 = 58

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

  7. 52

    Handling (owners)

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +31
    83
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Reviews found online5283
  8. 72

    Efficiency

    Winterhawk 4 +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests7264
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%93%
Scores at a glance
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Winterhawk 4Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
Relative Score 64 79
Dry 49 82
Wet 79 88
Snow 73 76
Comfort 59 77
Noise 76 62
Treadwear 58 74
Handling (owners) 52 83
Efficiency 72 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Winterhawk 4

± 5

WinterCraft WP52 plus

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Firestone Winterhawk 4 finished ahead 0 times and Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinterhawk 4WinterCraft WP52 plusΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 91% 98% −6.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Dry Handling Dry 97% 99% −1.9 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 80% 86% −5.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 97% −0.7 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Braking Wet 86% 91% −5.4 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Circle Wet 96% 96% −0.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wet Handling Wet 95% 97% −1.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Braking Snow 98% 97% +1.4 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Handling Snow 98% 99% −1.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Slalom Snow 99% 98% +1.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Snow Traction Snow 98% 95% +2.4 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 85% 91% −5.5 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Noise Noise 98% 98% +0.1 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Wear Treadwear 86% 88% −2.7 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 93% +1.3 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #4/20 #8/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 72% 77% −5.5 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #16/20 #8/20 – 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Winterhawk 4

Pros

  • Competitive pricing offering great value compared to premium brands
  • Good traction and performance in rain and snow conditions
  • Comfortable and exceptionally quiet ride quality

Cons

  • Steering feel can be relatively numb compared to ultra-high-performance summer tires
  • Potential quality control issues or manufacturing defects leading to difficult wheel balancing and vibration at high speeds
  • Mixed performance potential compared to top-tier premium winter alternatives
All owner themes in the Winterhawk 4 review

Tire B WinterCraft WP52 plus

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip performance rivaling premium tier competitors
  • High level of ride comfort and compliance compared to factory run-flats
  • Remarkably low road noise, often quieter than summer tires

Cons

  • Not recommended for extreme winter conditions where alternative budget brands like Barum might be better suited
  • Slightly less brand prestige compared to tier-one European or Japanese manufacturers
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WP52 plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Winterhawk 4 B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available76—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Winterhawk 4

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

Winner: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — better dry, handling and comfort. Pick the Firestone Winterhawk 4 if noise and efficiency matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 82 vs 49 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 83 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 77 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 74 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is snow braking

Firestone Winterhawk 4 won 3 of 3 shared snow braking tests.

Tire A · Firestone Winterhawk 4
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Which is better in the wet, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 88 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 82 vs 49 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 76 vs 73 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Firestone Winterhawk 4, 76 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 77 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 74 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Winterhawk 4 or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Firestone Winterhawk 4, 72 vs 64 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology