tirewheelguide

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 14 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–42

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or UHP Sport A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire AFuzion

UHP Sport A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 14 reviews

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 40

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +34
    74
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online2577

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 49.9 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 40

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 41

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +35
    76
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online3078

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 48.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.4 = 41

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.4 = 76

    No road tests of wet for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 45

    Snow

    Crugen HT51 +25
    70
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online2970

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 45

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 40

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +30
    70
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online2771

    UHP Sport A/S: 40% × 61.4 (est.) + 60% × 26.5 = 40

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 52

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +20
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2979

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 72

    No road tests of noise for UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Crugen HT51 +21
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 53 (est.)58
    Reviews found online3076

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 44

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 34

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +40
    74
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online3474
Scores at a glance
CategoryFuzion UHP Sport A/SKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 42 72
Dry 40 74
Wet 41 76
Snow 45 70
Comfort 40 70
Noise 52 72
Treadwear 44 65
Handling (owners) 34 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

UHP Sport A/S

± 8

Crugen HT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UHP Sport A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional affordability and overall value compared to name-brand alternatives
  • Firm sidewalls providing responsive handling and a sporty feel
  • Adequate performance on dry highways and pleasant ride quality for the price point

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by several users
  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar traction in wet and snowy conditions, with occasional reports of slipping
All owner themes in the UHP Sport A/S review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″12.5/32″
UTQG380 A A720 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S

Kumho Crugen HT51

Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Fuzion UHP Sport A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 76 vs 41 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 40 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 40 on comfort.

Tire A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 41 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 74 vs 40 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 45 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 40 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UHP Sport A/S or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology