Fuzion UHP Sport A/S looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 14 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

S FIT AS is ahead, 59–41

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire AFuzion

UHP Sport A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 14 reviews

Laufenn S FIT AS
Tire BLaufenn

S FIT AS

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 53 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #4 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 39

    Dry

    S FIT AS +21
    60
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online2455

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 23.5 = 39

    S FIT AS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    No road tests of dry for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 41

    Wet

    S FIT AS +17
    58
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online3054

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 48.1 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 41

    S FIT AS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 58

    No road tests of wet for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 46

    Snow

    S FIT AS +4
    50
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online2937

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 57.2 (est.) + 40% × 28.5 = 46

    S FIT AS: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50

    No road tests of snow for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 39

    Comfort

    S FIT AS +22
    61
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2558

    UHP Sport A/S: 40% × 59.8 (est.) + 60% × 25.3 = 39

    S FIT AS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for S FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 51

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online28–

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 27.8 = 51

    No road tests of noise for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    S FIT AS +23
    67
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 53 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3056

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 53.5 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 44

    S FIT AS: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 56.3 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 33

    Handling (owners)

    S FIT AS +22
    55
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SS FIT AS
    Reviews found online3355
Scores at a glance
Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Laufenn S FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFuzion UHP Sport A/SLaufenn S FIT AS
Relative Score 41 59
Dry 39 60
Wet 41 58
Snow 46 50
Comfort 39 61
Noise 51 –
Treadwear 44 67
Handling (owners) 33 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

UHP Sport A/S

± 7

S FIT AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UHP Sport A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional affordability and overall value compared to name-brand alternatives
  • Firm sidewalls providing responsive handling and a sporty feel
  • Adequate performance on dry highways and pleasant ride quality for the price point

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by several users
  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar traction in wet and snowy conditions, with occasional reports of slipping
All owner themes in the UHP Sport A/S review

Tire B S FIT AS

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price compared to ultra-budget alternatives
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Good grip and handling in dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip, with tendencies to lose traction easily under acceleration
  • Wet performance degrades noticeably after 50% wear
  • Concerns regarding rapid tread wear or limited lifespan
All owner themes in the S FIT AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S B · Laufenn S FIT AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG380 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S

Laufenn S FIT AS

Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Fuzion UHP Sport A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Laufenn S FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 67 vs 44 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 61 vs 39 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 55 vs 33 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 60 vs 39 on dry.

Tire A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Which is better in the wet, UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 58 vs 41 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 60 vs 39 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 50 vs 46 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 61 vs 39 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UHP Sport A/S or S FIT AS?

Laufenn S FIT AS, 67 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology