Fuzion UHP Sport A/S looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 14 + 12,721 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–41

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire AFuzion

UHP Sport A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 14 reviews

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 39

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +48
    87
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 49 (est.)89
    Reviews found online2484

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 49.5 (est.) + 40% × 23.5 = 39

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    No road tests of dry for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 41

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +48
    89
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 48 (est.)93
    Reviews found online3085

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 48.1 (est.) + 40% × 29.5 = 41

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.5 = 89

    No road tests of wet for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 46

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)–
    Reviews found online29–

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 57.2 (est.) + 40% × 28.5 = 46

    No road tests of snow for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 39

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +37
    76
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 60 (est.)82
    Reviews found online2572

    UHP Sport A/S: 40% × 59.8 (est.) + 60% × 25.3 = 39

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.5 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 51

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +19
    70
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online28≈ 66 (est.)

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 27.8 = 51

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No road tests of noise for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +27
    71
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 53 (est.)78
    Reviews found online3060

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 53.5 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 44

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 33

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +48
    81
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online3381
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SPilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–76
Scores at a glance
Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFuzion UHP Sport A/SMichelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score 41 82
Dry 39 87
Wet 41 89
Snow 46 –
Comfort 39 76
Noise 51 70
Treadwear 44 71
Handling (owners) 33 81
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

UHP Sport A/S

± 4

Pilot Sport 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UHP Sport A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional affordability and overall value compared to name-brand alternatives
  • Firm sidewalls providing responsive handling and a sporty feel
  • Adequate performance on dry highways and pleasant ride quality for the price point

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by several users
  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar traction in wet and snowy conditions, with occasional reports of slipping
All owner themes in the UHP Sport A/S review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—62
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG380 A A300 - 320 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Fuzion UHP Sport A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 39 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 41 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 33 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 39 on comfort.

Tire A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Which is better in the wet, UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 41 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 39 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 51 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 39 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UHP Sport A/S or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology