Fuzion UHP Sport A/S looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–40

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire AFuzion

UHP Sport A/S

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 26 · 14 reviews

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 38

    Dry

    Proxes ST +34
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online2275

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 49.2 (est.) + 40% × 21.8 = 38

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 38

    Wet

    Proxes ST +37
    75
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 46 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online2777

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 45.7 (est.) + 40% × 26.8 = 38

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 43

    Snow

    Proxes ST +23
    66
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online2564

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 24.9 = 43

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +26
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online2474

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 23.9 = 46

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 50

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online25–

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 24.8 = 50

    No road tests of noise for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 44

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +25
    69
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online2972

    UHP Sport A/S: 60% × 54.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.4 = 44

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for UHP Sport A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 30

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +41
    71
    Why this score
    SourceUHP Sport A/SProxes ST
    Reviews found online3071
Scores at a glance
Fuzion UHP Sport A/S vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFuzion UHP Sport A/SToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 40 71
Dry 38 72
Wet 38 75
Snow 43 66
Comfort 46 72
Noise 50 –
Treadwear 44 69
Handling (owners) 30 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

UHP Sport A/S

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UHP Sport A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional affordability and overall value compared to name-brand alternatives
  • Firm sidewalls providing responsive handling and a sporty feel
  • Adequate performance on dry highways and pleasant ride quality for the price point

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by several users
  • Noticeable road noise
  • Subpar traction in wet and snowy conditions, with occasional reports of slipping
All owner themes in the UHP Sport A/S review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG380 A A—
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Fuzion UHP Sport A/S

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Fuzion UHP Sport A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 30 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 38 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 38 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 46 on comfort.

Tire A · Fuzion UHP Sport A/S
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 38 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 38 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 43 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UHP Sport A/S or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 44 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology