Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews
General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
General AltiMAX RT vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 275 owner reviews. How we score
AltiMAX RT is ahead, 65–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 275 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
AltiMAX RT +1748Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 64 37 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 48
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
AltiMAX RT +1255Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 66 49 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
Crugen HP71: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
61
Snow
AltiMAX RT +457Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 55 48 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61
Crugen HP71: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 57
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
AltiMAX RT +1154Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 62 40 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 54
No road tests of comfort for AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
AltiMAX RT +858Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 44 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
Crugen HP71: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 58
No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
AltiMAX RT +2144Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 54 (est.) Reviews found online 64 29 AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
AltiMAX RT +955Why this score
Source AltiMAX RT Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 64 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | General AltiMAX RT | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 52 |
| Dry | 65 | 48 |
| Wet | 67 | 55 |
| Snow | 61 | 57 |
| Comfort | 65 | 54 |
| Noise | 66 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AltiMAX RT
Crugen HP71
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AltiMAX RT
Pros
- Affordable price point offering high value
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
- Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
General AltiMAX RT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
“Bought a set of Kumho tires to replace the OE Michelins on the wife's Ford Edge. The Michelins have barely 35K and aren't going to pass the NC safety check. For being a top tier tire they were wildly mediocre. I've has several sets of Kumho and they are better than average and not too expensive. I bought four of these. Anybody have experience with Kumhos? Kumho Crugen HP71 245 /60 R18 105V SL BSW”
“2023 ID4 AWD Pro S Kumho Crugen EV HP71 I replaced the original worn down (and one with a sidewall bump) Pirellis at 33k with the EV version (badges on the sidewall) of the HP71 (direct from dealer). They're more expensive than the non-EV versions and have a lower warranty. So far they're impressive: ride is softer/smoother, quieter, deep treads. Hard to tell if efficiency changed with the winter weather, but we were getting 3mi/kWh on a 34 degree day.”
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
Based on 51 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General AltiMAX RT | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 63 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 A A | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General AltiMAX RT
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: General AltiMAX RT — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 44 on treadwear.
General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 48 on dry.
General AltiMAX RT scores 67 vs 55 on wet.
General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 67 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 61 vs 57 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 66 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AltiMAX RT or Crugen HP71?
General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology