tirewheelguide

General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General AltiMAX RT vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

AltiMAX RT is ahead, 65–56

Check price on Amazon · AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General AltiMAX RT
Tire AGeneral

AltiMAX RT

All-Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    AltiMAX RT +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6449

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    AltiMAX RT +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6649

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 57.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 54

    No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    AltiMAX RT +7
    54
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5543

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    AltiMAX RT +5
    60
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6250

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    AltiMAX RT +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6553

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    AltiMAX RT +8
    57
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6451

    AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    AltiMAX RT +14
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAltiMAX RTEnergy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online6450
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral AltiMAX RTMichelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 65 56
Dry 65 56
Wet 67 54
Snow 61 54
Comfort 65 60
Noise 66 61
Treadwear 65 57
Handling (owners) 64 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

AltiMAX RT

Energy Saver A/S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AltiMAX RT

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering high value
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
  • Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
  • Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
All owner themes in the AltiMAX RT review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General AltiMAX RT B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll-Season Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG440 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General AltiMAX RT

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: General AltiMAX RT — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General AltiMAX RT scores 64 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General AltiMAX RT scores 67 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General AltiMAX RT scores 65 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · General AltiMAX RT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 67 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 61 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 66 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AltiMAX RT or Energy Saver A/S?

General AltiMAX RT, 65 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology