Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 82 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber APT vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 82 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber APT is ahead, 68–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Grabber APT +1057Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 67 51 Grabber APT: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
No road tests of dry for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
Grabber APT +1559Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 75 54 Grabber APT: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 74
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of wet for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Grabber APT +661Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 56 Grabber APT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61
No road tests of snow for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
64
Comfort
Grabber APT +1153Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 46 Grabber APT: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 64
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.6 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 53 – Grabber APT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 61
No road tests of noise for Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Grabber APT +1555Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 71 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 68 48 Grabber APT: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 68.4 = 70
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Grabber APT +1048Why this score
Source Grabber APT Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 58 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber APT | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 57 |
| Dry | 67 | 57 |
| Wet | 74 | 59 |
| Snow | 67 | 61 |
| Comfort | 64 | 53 |
| Noise | 61 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Grabber APT
57
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber APT
Pros
- Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance
Cons
- Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
General Grabber APT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment regarding the Hankook Dynapro AT2 line is divided, heavily dependent on whether users evaluate the OEM factory tire or the retail/Xtreme version. The standard OEM AT2 receives notable criticism for lacking true all-terrain capability, poor wet/winter grip, and premature wear, while highway comfort and quietness are praised. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for strong snow traction, improved wet performance, durability, and quiet road manners.
f150lightningforum.com
·2025-03-08
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2023-03-21
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#OEM versus retail differences#Wet traction and braking#Winter and snow performance#Highway noise and comfort#Tread life and durability#Dynapro AT2 Xtreme upgrades
Based on 56 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber APT | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 25 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 12 - 16/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 360 - 740 A - AA A - B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 90 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
General Grabber APT
57
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Winner: General Grabber APT — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber APT scores 74 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber APT scores 70 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber APT scores 64 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber APT scores 67 vs 57 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber APT
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber APT, 74 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber APT, 67 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber APT, 67 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber APT, 64 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber APT or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber APT, 70 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology