Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic LT vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Blizzak DM-V2 leads, 72–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Grabber Arctic LT +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online7269
  2. 75

    Wet

    Blizzak DM-V2 +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online7778
  3. 71

    Snow

    Blizzak DM-V2 +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online7285
  4. 69

    Comfort

    Blizzak DM-V2 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online7072
  5. 66

    Noise

    Blizzak DM-V2 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online6671
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic LT +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online6962
  7. 71

    Handling

    Blizzak DM-V2 +6
    77
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTBlizzak DM-V2
    Reviews found online7177
Scores at a glance
General Grabber Arctic LT vs Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber Arctic LTBridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Relative Score 71 72
Dry 71 69
Wet 75 76
Snow 71 79
Comfort 69 71
Noise 66 68
Treadwear 67 63
Handling 71 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber Arctic LT

Blizzak DM-V2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Blizzak DM-V2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
  • High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
  • Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
  • Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
All owner themes in the Blizzak DM-V2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic LT B · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Category—Winter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available673
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth16/32″13/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic LT

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2

Too close to call: General Grabber Arctic LT and Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 are within 2 points overall. General Grabber Arctic LT is stronger on treadwear. Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is stronger on snow and handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 79 vs 71 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic LT
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Narrow edge

Blizzak DM-V2

Amazon