tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber Arctic LT vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: Grabber Arctic LT and Crugen HT51 are level at 71.

Check price on Amazon · Grabber Arctic LT or Crugen HT51 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online7277
  2. 75

    Wet

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online7777
  3. 71

    Snow

    Grabber Arctic LT +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online7270
  4. 69

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online7072
  5. 66

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online6678
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Grabber Arctic LT +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–58
    Reviews found online6974
  7. 71

    Handling

    Crugen HT51 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber Arctic LTCrugen HT51
    Reviews found online7175
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber Arctic LTKumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 71 73
Wet 75 75
Snow 71 70
Comfort 69 71
Noise 66 71
Treadwear 67 64
Handling 71 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber Arctic LT

Crugen HT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber Arctic LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber Arctic LT B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Category—All Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available644
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth16/32″12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure80 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber Arctic LT

Kumho Crugen HT51

Too close to call: General Grabber Arctic LT and Kumho Crugen HT51 are within 2 points overall. General Grabber Arctic LT is stronger on treadwear. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on noise and handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 71 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber Arctic LT scores 67 vs 64 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber Arctic LT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Too close to call

Grabber Arctic LT

Amazon