Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber Arctic vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Grabber Arctic leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #7 of 8 in 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Blizzak LM25 4X4 +266Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 62 65 -
71
Wet
Grabber Arctic +962Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 71 60 -
75
Snow
Grabber Arctic +669Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 79 69 -
68
Comfort
Grabber Arctic +662Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 67 56 -
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 63 – -
67
Treadwear
Grabber Arctic +463Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online 69 62 -
–
Handling
No comparison62Why this score
Source Grabber Arctic Blizzak LM25 4X4 Reviews found online – 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber Arctic | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 65 |
| Dry | 64 | 66 |
| Wet | 71 | 62 |
| Snow | 75 | 69 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling | – | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Grabber Arctic
65
/ 100
Blizzak LM25 4X4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Grabber Arctic | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 57% #4/8 · 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | 14% #7/8 · 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test | +42.9 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber Arctic
Pros
- Exceptional traction and handling in snow and slush
- Great value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Reliable cold-weather performance on wet and icy surfaces
Cons
- Moderate road noise when studded or on dry/slightly wet pavement
- Average performance on hard-packed ice unless studded
- Directional/rotational tread pattern may limit tire rotation options for some drivers
Tire B Blizzak LM25 4X4
Pros
- Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
- Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
- Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.
Cons
- Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
- Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
- Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber Arctic | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 17″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
General Grabber Arctic
65
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Winner: General Grabber Arctic — better wet, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber Arctic scores 71 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber Arctic scores 75 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber Arctic scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber Arctic scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · General Grabber Arctic
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.