Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews
General Grabber A/T vs General Grabber GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 65 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber GT is ahead, 75–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 65 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Grabber GT +1175Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 62 79 Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
Grabber GT: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Grabber GT +1177Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 64 79 Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66
Grabber GT: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Grabber GT +1173Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 59 75 Grabber A/T: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
Grabber GT: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Grabber GT +1074Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 63 79 Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
Grabber GT: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Grabber GT +1275Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Grabber GT Reviews found online 63 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/T | General Grabber GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 75 |
| Dry | 64 | 75 |
| Wet | 66 | 77 |
| Snow | 64 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Grabber A/T
Grabber GT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/T
Pros
- Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
- Good performance in snow and winter conditions
- Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives
Cons
- Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
- Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
- Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
Tire B Grabber GT
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
- Great value for price and budget-friendly
- Reliable traction in dry, wet, and light off-road conditions
Cons
- Vague or scary grip in the wet as the tires age
- Can become noisy over time
- Occasional reports of uneven wear or early punctures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/T | B · General Grabber GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 49 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 23″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber A/T
General Grabber GT
Winner: General Grabber GT — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General Grabber GT scores 75 vs 63 on handling.
General Grabber GT scores 75 vs 64 on dry.
General Grabber GT scores 77 vs 66 on wet.
General Grabber GT scores 73 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/T or Grabber GT?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/T or Grabber GT?
General Grabber GT, 77 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/T or Grabber GT?
General Grabber GT, 75 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/T or Grabber GT?
General Grabber GT, 73 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/T or Grabber GT?
General Grabber GT, 74 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology