Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber X3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 370 + 119 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 119 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Level69Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
Grabber X3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
Grabber A/TX +470Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 69 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Grabber X3: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 70
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Grabber X3 +170Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 69 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69
Grabber X3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +558Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 52 Grabber A/TX: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.4 = 63
Grabber X3: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.1 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Grabber A/TX +559Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 48 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64
Grabber X3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 59
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +664Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 63 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Grabber X3: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/TX +553Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Grabber X3 Reviews found online 58 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 69 | 69 |
| Wet | 74 | 70 |
| Snow | 69 | 70 |
| Comfort | 63 | 58 |
| Noise | 64 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
66
/ 100
Grabber X3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Grabber X3
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
- Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering
Cons
- Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
- Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
- Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
r/f150
·14 upvotes ·2021-09-13
“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
f150forum.com
“Got tired of my stock tires looking undersized with my 2" level, so I finally put new ones on last week. I had KO2's on my last truck and was planning on going with them again, but I couldn't find the size I wanted at a decent price locally. I started reading reviews on TireRack and the General Grabber A/Tx gets the highest rating. I really liked the look and price, so I had my local Tire Discounters get me a set. These things are awesome. Very quiet and a smooth ride. I went with the LT285/60 20's (33.5") and they really fill out the wheel wells like they should.”
ram-trx.com
·2025-10-03
“I've got just over 10,000 miles on my General Grabber A/Tx's and I love them. For the terrain I cover, they are great. If you're looking for a mud tire, these aren't going to clean out very well (probably similar to an average A/T like a BFG KO2). But in the deep snow and ice, they've been great. They are also amazingly quiet on the highway, and on loose dirt/gravel they have done really well. I don't have enough miles to tell you how long they will last, but going off how they are wearing right now, I'm optimistic I can get 40,000 miles out of them (I rotate my tires every 4,000 miles).”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
General Grabber X3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 18 - 21/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
66
/ 100
General Grabber X3
Narrow edge: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, comfort and noise. Where the General Grabber X3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber A/TX scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
General Grabber A/TX scores 64 vs 59 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · General Grabber X3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
General Grabber A/TX, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
General Grabber A/TX, 64 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
General Grabber A/TX, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Grabber X3?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology