Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 370 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +8
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6942

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +8
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 73 (est.)74
    Reviews found online7552

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 69 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6868

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Grabber A/TX +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6341

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +15
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7245

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/TX +12
    49
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXUltraGrip Ice Arctic
    Reviews found online6149
Scores at a glance
General Grabber A/TX vs Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXGoodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Relative Score 69 61
Dry 68 60
Wet 73 65
Snow 69 72
Comfort 66 55
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 69 54
Handling (owners) 61 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber A/TX

UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling on packed snow
  • Strong performance on ice during the first two seasons
  • Reliable winter grip in extreme arctic conditions

Cons

  • Significant stud loss after two seasons of use
  • Abrupt and dangerous decline in grip performance by the third year
  • Poor longevity relative to competitors despite remaining tread depth
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Ice Arctic review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
CategoryAll-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth14 - 17/32″—
UTQG640 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber A/TX scores 61 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber A/TX scores 66 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, 72 vs 69 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

General Grabber A/TX, 66 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?

General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology