Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 370 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–61
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 42 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 73 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 52 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 68 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 41 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 63 | – |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 45 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 49 |
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 61 |
| Dry | 68 | 60 |
| Wet | 73 | 65 |
| Snow | 69 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 55 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Grabber A/TX
UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Based on 37 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 44 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
General Grabber A/TX
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic if snow matters most to you.
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.
General Grabber A/TX scores 61 vs 49 on handling.
General Grabber A/TX scores 66 vs 55 on comfort.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 60 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, 72 vs 69 on our snow score.
General Grabber A/TX, 66 vs 55 on our comfort score.
General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology