Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 373 + 245 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro AT2 Xtreme leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme
Tire BHankook

Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 77 · 245 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (ice traction)

“New shoes on my ‘23 XSE Wanted to stick with black rims but saw these on an older gen and loved the look. Wrapped in 245/65R17 Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme‘s. Also replaced the OEM springs with Eibach lift springs for a bit more ride height.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +7
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6879

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 78.8 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 73 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7479

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 63.5 + 40% × 78.6 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)69
    Reviews found online67≈ 70 (est.)

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 70 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No owner ratings of snow for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5870

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 40% × 70.7 + 60% × 70.3 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6076

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 75.8 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7277

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro AT2 Xtreme +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AT2 Xtreme
    Reviews found online5972
Scores at a glance
General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXHankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 68 75
Wet 73 70
Snow 68 69
Comfort 61 70
Noise 64 73
Treadwear 70 73
Handling (owners) 59 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber A/TX

± 7

Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet on the highway considering the aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Strong traction and confidence-inspiring performance in snow and winter weather
  • Stable handling and reliability while towing heavy loads and trailers

Cons

  • Occasional reports of highway vibrations, wobbles, or balancing difficulties
  • Some users noted less-than-ideal grip or traction during acceleration on wet roads
  • A few complaints regarding a rougher-than-expected ride quality or potential cupping
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its aggressive appearance and confident performance in snow and wet conditions. Drivers also appreciate its comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires and its strong 70,000-mile warranty. While noted as being slightly pricey and showing minor trade-offs in dry handling due to aggressive lugs, it is widely favored as an upgrade over older all-terrain models.

Top themes
#snow and winter performance#aggressive tread design#comfortable ride quality#wet road traction#70k mile warranty#lifted vehicle setups

Based on 11 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available4416
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth14 - 17/32″—
UTQG640 A A - B480 - 660 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme — better handling, comfort and noise. Pick the General Grabber A/TX if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme scores 72 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme scores 70 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme scores 73 vs 64 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme scores 75 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme, 70 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AT2 Xtreme?

Hankook Dynapro AT2 Xtreme, 73 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology