Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 370 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +662Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 59 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Grabber A/TX +568Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 67 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73
Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 68 – Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +165Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 61 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66
Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +465Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/TX +457Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HP Reviews found online 61 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 64 |
| Dry | 68 | 62 |
| Wet | 73 | 68 |
| Snow | 69 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 65 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
64
/ 100
Dynapro HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
r/Crosstrek
·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Hankook Dynapro HP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 14 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
64
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 62 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP?
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HP?
General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology