Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 65 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber GT vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 65 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Grabber GT and Dynapro HP2 RA33 are level at 75.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 67 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Grabber GT +174Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 77 Grabber GT: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74
No road tests of dry for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Level77Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 79 80 Grabber GT: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 75.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.8 = 77
No road tests of wet for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison68Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 67 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
Dynapro HP2 RA33 +275Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 77 Grabber GT: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 77.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 70
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
Grabber GT +173Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 77 Grabber GT: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74
Dynapro HP2 RA33: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2 RA33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Grabber GT +174Why this score
Source Grabber GT Dynapro HP2 RA33 Reviews found online 75 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber GT | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 75 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 77 | 77 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 73 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Grabber GT
75
/ 100
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, General Grabber GT finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Grabber GT | Dynapro HP2 RA33 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/15 | #11/15 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test · 215/65 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber GT
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
- Great value for price and budget-friendly
- Reliable traction in dry, wet, and light off-road conditions
Cons
- Vague or scary grip in the wet as the tires age
- Can become noisy over time
- Occasional reports of uneven wear or early punctures
Tire B Dynapro HP2 RA33
Pros
- Exceptional value and cost-effectiveness compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet traction under normal driving conditions
Cons
- Occasional road noise or humming sound at higher speeds or on concrete surfaces
- Potential for faster or average tread wear depending on driving habits and vehicle type
- Some users reported sketchy wet cornering grip or sliding on roundabouts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber GT | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 23″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sizes in common | 33 | 33 |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
General Grabber GT
75
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
Too close to call: General Grabber GT and Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 are within 2 points overall.
Tire A · General Grabber GT
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber GT or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber GT or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber GT or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber GT or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber GT or Dynapro HP2 RA33?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology