Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 65 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber GT vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 65 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber GT leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Grabber GT +669Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 70 Grabber GT: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 75
Defender T+H: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Grabber GT +572Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 73 Grabber GT: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 77
Defender T+H: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 72
No road tests of wet for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 61 Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
Grabber GT +667Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 66 Grabber GT: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.6 = 73
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 66 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
74
Treadwear
Grabber GT +173Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 79 68 Grabber GT: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 67.9 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Grabber GT Defender T+H Reviews found online 75 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber GT | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 69 |
| Wet | 77 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Grabber GT
71
/ 100
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Grabber GT | Defender T+H | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #9/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | #1/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber GT
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
- Great value for price and budget-friendly
- Reliable traction in dry, wet, and light off-road conditions
Cons
- Vague or scary grip in the wet as the tires age
- Can become noisy over time
- Occasional reports of uneven wear or early punctures
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber GT | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 23″ | — |
| UTQG | — | 820 A - B B |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
General Grabber GT
71
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
Narrow edge: General Grabber GT — better dry, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber GT scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber GT scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber GT scores 77 vs 72 on wet.
Tire A · General Grabber GT
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber GT or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber GT or Defender T+H?
General Grabber GT, 77 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber GT or Defender T+H?
General Grabber GT, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber GT or Defender T+H?
General Grabber GT, 73 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber GT or Defender T+H?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology