Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 268 reviews
General Grabber UHP vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 268 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Road Venture APT KL51 is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Road Venture APT KL51 +169Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 69 Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of dry for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Road Venture APT KL51 +370Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 70 Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of wet for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
46
Snow
Road Venture APT KL51 +1965Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 30 61 Grabber UHP: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.7 = 46
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
Road Venture APT KL51 +770Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 61 70 Grabber UHP: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.9 = 63
Road Venture APT KL51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Road Venture APT KL51 +367Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 69 Grabber UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Road Venture APT KL51 +1270Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 72 Grabber UHP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Road Venture APT KL51 +669Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 63 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber UHP | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 67 | 70 |
| Snow | 46 | 65 |
| Comfort | 63 | 70 |
| Noise | 64 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber UHP
Road Venture APT KL51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber UHP
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with strong resistance to hydroplaning
- High value for money compared to premium OE brands
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride quality on highways
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Mixed performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Some complaints regarding rapid wear or balancing issues on certain heavy vehicles
Tire B Road Venture APT KL51
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
- High-value pricing offering significant savings compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction with dependable on-road handling and braking
Cons
- Mediocre performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Slightly increased rolling resistance leading to a minor reduction in fuel economy for some drivers
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall aesthetics or soft feel in high summer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber UHP | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 11 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 24″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 - 360 A A | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber UHP
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better snow, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 65 vs 46 on snow.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 58 on treadwear.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 63 on comfort.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 69 vs 63 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 65 vs 46 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber UHP or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology