tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Latitude Tour HP vs General Grabber UHP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 268 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber UHP is ahead, 62–57

Check price on Amazon · Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Grabber UHP +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5167

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Grabber UHP +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5465

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Latitude Tour HP +13
    46
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online5130

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 59

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.7 = 46

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Grabber UHP +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5361

    Latitude Tour HP: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58

    Grabber UHP: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Grabber UHP +2
    58
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5052

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber UHP +14
    63
    Why this score
    SourceLatitude Tour HPGrabber UHP
    Reviews found online4963
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Latitude Tour HPGeneral Grabber UHP
Relative Score 57 62
Dry 57 68
Wet 58 67
Snow 59 46
Comfort 58 63
Noise – 64
Treadwear 56 58
Handling (owners) 49 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Latitude Tour HP

± 7

Grabber UHP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Latitude Tour HP

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour HP review

Tire B Grabber UHP

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with strong resistance to hydroplaning
  • High value for money compared to premium OE brands
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride quality on highways

Cons

  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Mixed performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Some complaints regarding rapid wear or balancing issues on certain heavy vehicles
All owner themes in the Grabber UHP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP B · General Grabber UHP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available711
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 24″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG400 - 440 A A320 - 360 A A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

General Grabber UHP

Winner: General Grabber UHP — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber UHP scores 63 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 59 vs 46 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber UHP scores 68 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber UHP scores 67 vs 58 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber UHP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

Which is better in the wet, Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

General Grabber UHP, 67 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

General Grabber UHP, 68 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 59 vs 46 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

General Grabber UHP, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Latitude Tour HP or Grabber UHP?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 58 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology