tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Pirelli Scorpion ATR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 32 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Grabber X3 68, Scorpion ATR 67.

Check price on Amazon · Grabber X3 Check price on Amazon · Scorpion ATR
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Scorpion ATR +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7173

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7165

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Scorpion ATR +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5868

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Scorpion ATR +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5272

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6565

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Scorpion ATR: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Scorpion ATR +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion ATR
    Reviews found online5869
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Pirelli Scorpion ATR
Relative Score 68 67
Dry 70 71
Wet 71 66
Snow 70 63
Comfort 64 68
Noise 61 69
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 58 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Scorpion ATR

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Scorpion ATR

Pros

  • Exceptionally smooth and quiet ride on the highway for an all-terrain tire
  • Confident dry and wet traction with reliable handling in rain and mud
  • Sturdy construction offering good puncture resistance on rough terrain

Cons

  • Poor performance in deep, hard-packed snow and ice
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing rapid wear or steel belts showing prematurely
  • Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance decline noticeably as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Scorpion ATR review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Pirelli Scorpion ATR
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available618
Rim diameters16″ – 18″14″ – 22″
Tread depth18 - 21/32″11/32″
UTQGAA A440 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Pirelli Scorpion ATR

Too close to call: General Grabber X3 and Pirelli Scorpion ATR are within 2 points overall. General Grabber X3 is stronger on snow and wet. Pirelli Scorpion ATR is stronger on handling, noise and comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 69 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 69 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion ATR
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 69 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Scorpion ATR?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology