tirewheelguide

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–61

Check price on Amazon · Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +9
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7158

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7153

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5862

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6564

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online5858
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 68 61
Dry 70 61
Wet 71 57
Snow 70 –
Comfort 64 65
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 58 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategoryMud-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth18 - 21/32″—
UTQGAA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Winner: General Grabber X3 — better wet and dry. Where the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology