tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 171 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar G91AV leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar G91AV or Grabber X3 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Geolandar G91AV +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7167

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7068

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Geolandar G91AV +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5874

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Geolandar G91AV +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5270

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G91AV +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6571

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar G91AV +18
    76
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar G91AV
    Reviews found online5876
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Relative Score 68 70
Dry 70 73
Wet 71 68
Snow 70 69
Comfort 64 71
Noise 61 68
Treadwear 65 69
Handling (owners) 58 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Geolandar G91AV

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Geolandar G91AV

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
  • Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
  • Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting

Cons

  • Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
  • Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
  • Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
All owner themes in the Geolandar G91AV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available62
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″ – 18″
Tread depth18 - 21/32″10/32″
UTQGAA A280 B A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV

Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, comfort and noise. Pick the General Grabber X3 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 71 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 68 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 71 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Geolandar G91AV?

Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology