Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online7153

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Geolandar H/T G039: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G039. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +12
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7155

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Geolandar H/T G039: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G039. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7058

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Geolandar H/T G039: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G039. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Grabber X3 +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5850

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Geolandar H/T G039: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +11
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Geolandar H/T G039: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G039. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber X3 +5
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Geolandar H/T G039
    Reviews found online5853
Scores at a glance
General Grabber X3 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039
Relative Score 68 58
Dry 70 58
Wet 71 59
Snow 70 63
Comfort 64 59
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 65 54
Handling (owners) 58 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Geolandar H/T G039

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Geolandar H/T G039

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth18 - 21/32″—
UTQGAA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering—
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039

Winner: General Grabber X3 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 63 on snow.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 63 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

General Grabber X3, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Geolandar H/T G039?

General Grabber X3, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology