Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 275 reviews
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar H/T G039 is ahead, 57–51
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 275 reviews
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 3 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 36 | 53 |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 49 | 55 |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 48 | 58 |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 40 | 50 |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 43 | – |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 30 | 45 |
| Source | Crugen HP71 | Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 53 |
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 57 |
| Dry | 47 | 58 |
| Wet | 54 | 59 |
| Snow | 57 | 63 |
| Comfort | 55 | 60 |
| Noise | 57 | – |
| Treadwear | 44 | 54 |
| Handling | 55 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Crugen HP71
Geolandar H/T G039
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
“The HP71 are actually the OE tire for several trim/MY combinations for the Ioniq 5 and EV6 and they're decent tires. The longest lasting tire is the Defender 2, with the trade off of mediocre traction. I run the Nokian One because it's a batter balance of traction and tread wear than the defender but still quiet and very long-lasting.”
Based on 51 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 63 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 640 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Kumho Crugen HP71
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 — better dry, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 scores 58 vs 47 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 scores 54 vs 44 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 scores 63 vs 57 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G039 scores 59 vs 54 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.