Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Kumho Solus TA71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 38 owner reviews. How we score
Solus TA71 leads, 50–48 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 38 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Solus TA71 +448Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 32 37 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.9 = 44
Solus TA71: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.8 = 48
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
Crugen HP71 +250Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 45 42 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
Solus TA71: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 50
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Crugen HP71 +152Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 42 41 Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 53
Solus TA71: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 52
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
Solus TA71 +247Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 33 36 Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
Solus TA71: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 35.6 = 47
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Noise
Solus TA71 +459Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 37 48 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 55
Solus TA71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 59
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
Solus TA71 +1855Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 18 49 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.2 = 37
Solus TA71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.7 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
Crugen HP71 +1636Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Solus TA71 Reviews found online 52 36
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Kumho Solus TA71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 50 |
| Dry | 44 | 48 |
| Wet | 52 | 50 |
| Snow | 53 | 52 |
| Comfort | 45 | 47 |
| Noise | 55 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 36 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
48
/ 100
Crugen HP71
50
/ 100
Solus TA71
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B Solus TA71
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong tread life longevity
Cons
- Occasional reports of vague steering or 'wandering' feel
- Mushy cornering stability during aggressive maneuvers
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/CX5
·1 upvote ·2026-10-04
“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”
r/nissanpathfinder
·1 upvote ·2026-05-31
“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”
r/KiaEV6
·2 upvotes ·2023-06-08
“Tire troubles - 19" Kumho Crugen HP71 I have a US spec 2022 Wind AWD with 23,000 miles on these Kumho tires. In my less than 9 months of ownership I've had two tires patched from slow leaks and I just had to have the foam lining removed from a tire since it separated from the inner tire wall and created massive vibrations in the steering wheel. With one of the patches my local shop pulled a stone that was less than 1/4" from the tread where it punctured the tire. Yes, it was pointy and sharp but also comically tiny. I'm I just extra special lucky or are others having issues with these tires? I really hope there are more options for our vehicles when it comes time to replace these.”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Kumho Solus TA71
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Kumho Solus TA71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
48
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
50
/ 100
Kumho Solus TA71
Narrow edge: Kumho Solus TA71 — better treadwear, dry and noise. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP71 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Solus TA71 scores 55 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Crugen HP71 scores 52 vs 36 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Solus TA71 scores 48 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Solus TA71 scores 59 vs 55 on noise.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 50 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Kumho Solus TA71, 48 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 52 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Kumho Solus TA71, 59 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Neither, by our numbers: 45 vs 47 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Solus TA71?
Kumho Solus TA71, 55 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology