Tests – · none yet Owners 35 · 277 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Firestone Destination LE2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 277 + 102 owner reviews. How we score
Destination LE2 is ahead, 68–48
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 102 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
44
Dry
Destination LE2 +2367Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 32 67 Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.9 (est.) + 40% × 31.9 = 44
Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
Destination LE2 +1870Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 45 69 Crugen HP71: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 52
Destination LE2: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Destination LE2 +1366Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 42 64 Crugen HP71: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 53
Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
45
Comfort
Destination LE2 +1964Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 33 62 Crugen HP71: 40% × 62.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.4 = 45
Destination LE2: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.5 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Noise
Destination LE2 +1469Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 37 71 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.6 = 55
Destination LE2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 69
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
37
Treadwear
Destination LE2 +3168Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 49 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 18 69 Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.2 = 37
Destination LE2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
Destination LE2 +1567Why this score
Source Crugen HP71 Destination LE2 Reviews found online 52 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP71 | Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 68 |
| Dry | 44 | 67 |
| Wet | 52 | 70 |
| Snow | 53 | 66 |
| Comfort | 45 | 64 |
| Noise | 55 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 37 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
48
/ 100
Crugen HP71
68
/ 100
Destination LE2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
Tire B Destination LE2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction
- Affordable, high-value pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
- Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
r/KiaEV9
·1 upvote ·2026-09-28
“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”
r/Cadillac
·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28
“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”
r/volvoc40
·61 upvotes ·2026-07-08
“Yet Another C40 Wheel Downsize Report I decided to join the crowd in downsizing from the factory 20" wheels to 18" Wheels: Voxx Paso Tires: Kumho Crugen EV HP71 (currently on sale for $500 for a set of 4) I was a bit worried about wheel fitment because of the large brake calipers, but they fit without issue, standard install. I've only put about 100 miles on them so far, but the ride is much more comfortable and these new tires are SO much quieter than the old tires that were installed when I bought the vehicle (CPO): Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4 I don't have enough data yet to see if this will make a range improvement, but I imagine it will as they're skinnier tires and EV optimized. So far I'm impressed with the Kumho's, especially for the price they're offering. And I think these new wheels look pretty decent! Read more”
Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues
Based on 52 community posts
Tire B
Firestone Destination LE2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP71 | B · Firestone Destination LE2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 63 | 5 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9.9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 520 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
48
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
68
/ 100
Firestone Destination LE2
Winner: Firestone Destination LE2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 68 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 67 vs 44 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 64 vs 45 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Firestone Destination LE2 scores 70 vs 52 on wet.
Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Firestone Destination LE2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 70 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 67 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 66 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 69 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 64 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Destination LE2?
Firestone Destination LE2, 68 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology