tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–62

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Assurance CS Fuel Max on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5777

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5362

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 60

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5375

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6073

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 64

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +12
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAssurance CS Fuel MaxDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online5971
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Assurance CS Fuel MaxHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 62 71
Dry 61 73
Wet 65 74
Snow 60 65
Comfort 61 72
Noise 64 70
Treadwear 64 71
Handling (owners) 59 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Assurance CS Fuel Max

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Assurance CS Fuel Max

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
  • Improved fuel economy
  • Consistent and reliable on-road handling

Cons

  • Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
  • Limited availability at some local retailers
  • Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
All owner themes in the Assurance CS Fuel Max review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available229
Rim diameters17″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 11/32″13/32″
UTQG600 A B560 A B
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallVertical Serrated BandOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better dry, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 72 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Assurance CS Fuel Max or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology