Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 18 reviews
Goodyear DuraGrip vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: DuraGrip 65, Dynapro HP 64.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
DuraGrip +362Why this score
Source DuraGrip Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 63 59 DuraGrip: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of dry for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Dynapro HP +168Why this score
Source DuraGrip Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 67 DuraGrip: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of wet for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Comfort
DuraGrip +165Why this score
Source DuraGrip Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 61 DuraGrip: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66
Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for DuraGrip or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Dynapro HP +165Why this score
Source DuraGrip Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 63 65 DuraGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for DuraGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
DuraGrip +457Why this score
Source DuraGrip Dynapro HP Reviews found online 61 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear DuraGrip | Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 64 |
| Dry | 65 | 62 |
| Wet | 67 | 68 |
| Comfort | 66 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
DuraGrip
Dynapro HP
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A DuraGrip
Pros
- Strong dry-weather traction and handling
- Surprisingly effective performance in light snow conditions
- High value-for-money proposition
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet grip as the tire ages
- Tendency for premature edge wear on certain vehicle geometries
- Hardening of rubber compound over time leading to reduced traction
Tire B Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear DuraGrip | B · Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 14 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 15″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear DuraGrip
Hankook Dynapro HP
Too close to call: Goodyear DuraGrip and Hankook Dynapro HP are within 2 points overall. Goodyear DuraGrip is stronger on dry. Goodyear DuraGrip rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear DuraGrip scores 65 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
DuraGrip or Dynapro HP?
Which is better in the wet, DuraGrip or Dynapro HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, DuraGrip or Dynapro HP?
Goodyear DuraGrip, 65 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, DuraGrip or Dynapro HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, DuraGrip or Dynapro HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology