Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 10 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat vs Bridgestone Potenza S007A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza S007A is ahead, 68–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Potenza S007A +1369Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Potenza S007A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 49 69 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
Potenza S007A +1068Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Potenza S007A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 54 67 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 58
Potenza S007A: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza S007A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
49
Comfort
Potenza S007A +1766Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Potenza S007A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 39 64 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 40% × 63.5 (est.) + 60% × 38.6 = 49
Potenza S007A: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
49
Treadwear
Potenza S007A +1968Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Potenza S007A Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 39 64 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat: 60% × 56.6 (est.) + 40% × 38.6 = 49
Potenza S007A: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 64.3 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison76Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat Potenza S007A Reviews found online – 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat | Bridgestone Potenza S007A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 68 |
| Dry | 56 | 69 |
| Wet | 58 | 68 |
| Comfort | 49 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Potenza S007A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Potenza S007A
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and high-speed cornering stability
- Stiff sidewalls providing precise steering response and excellent feedback
- Strong track-day performance with improved lap times compared to predecessor models
Cons
- Subpar wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance, especially when pushed
- Poor performance and sliding tendencies in colder temperatures
- Fast tread wear under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat | B · Bridgestone Potenza S007A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat
Bridgestone Potenza S007A
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S007A — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Potenza S007A rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 68 vs 49 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 66 vs 49 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 69 vs 56 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza S007A scores 68 vs 58 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A?
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 68 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A?
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 69 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A?
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 66 vs 49 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 RunOnFlat or Potenza S007A?
Bridgestone Potenza S007A, 68 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology