Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 2,840 + 1,727 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 71–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,840 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 53 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 76
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 81 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 60 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 79.3 = 80
EfficientGrip: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 35 | 65 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 49
EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 54 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 78.8 + 60% × 72.7 = 75
EfficientGrip: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 54 = 59
No road tests of comfort for EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 42 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 69
EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 42 = 57
No road tests of noise for EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 53 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
EfficientGrip: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 47 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 70 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 60 |
| Dry | 76 | 58 |
| Wet | 80 | 63 |
| Snow | 49 | 67 |
| Comfort | 75 | 59 |
| Noise | 69 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 47 |
| Efficiency | 70 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
EfficientGrip
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | EfficientGrip | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 | #7/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its wet-weather handling, quiet road noise, and comfortable ride quality compared to competitors and run-flat alternatives. While traction and longevity are generally viewed favorably, a few owners noted moderate grip limitations under hard acceleration or confusion regarding all-season versus summer classifications.
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Based on 21 community posts
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
“Nov KUMHO ecsta sport ps 72 ili minimalno korišćen GOODYEAR efficientgrip 2? Pozdrav, molim za savet ko je imao iskustva sa ovim modelima guma. Trebaju mi letnje gume za Mazda 3 2.0 benzin 150 KS (na sport oprugama) i imam dve ponude: Nove Kumho ecsta sport ps 72 ili (pouzdano znam) 2000km korišćene Goodyear Efficientgrip performance 2 sa DOT 0726. Cena je bukvalno ista, godišnje prelazim oko 6k, volim da vozim dinamično kada može. Za Kumho sam čitao da je skoro predstavljena i da je solidna dok sam za Goodyear čitao da je za udobnu vožnju bez dinamike. Da li suštinski ta "sport" razlika može da se oseti u povremenoj dinamičnoj vožnji toliko pa da ima smisla odustati od povoljne odlične premium gume? Read more”
“How bad is this? Should I replace these Goodyear efficient grips? Apparent tread chipping. DOT 2021, Made in 🇩🇪. Run 30k kilometres(18,000 miles). Mild off-roading on some back roads. Has seen 2 summers in Dubai. Chipping only in front 2 tyres. Diligently rotated tyres every 10k kms. Please advice …..”
“Goodyear EfficientGrip - fitted in 2023 ~€520. Currently have 54k on them. Probably got another 2-3k before they’re down to the wear bars.”
Based on 21 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Goodyear EfficientGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Goodyear EfficientGrip if snow matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 47 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 76 vs 58 on dry.
Goodyear EfficientGrip scores 67 vs 49 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 80 vs 63 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 80 vs 63 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 76 vs 58 on our dry score.
Goodyear EfficientGrip, 67 vs 49 on our snow score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 69 vs 57 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 64 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
