tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 2 road tests and 2,840 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 71–60

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,840 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)

“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +26
    50
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7542
    Reviews found online7861

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 76

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50

  2. 80

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +20
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests8157
    Reviews found online7965

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 79.2 = 80

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60

  3. 49

    Snow

    Advan Sport AS +7
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online3548

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 49

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +11
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7962
    Reviews found online7365

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 78.8 + 60% × 72.7 = 75

    Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.7 = 64

  5. 69

    Noise

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7073
    Reviews found online6964

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 69

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.6 = 69

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport AS +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)81
    Reviews found online6260

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.7 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +14
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Reviews found online7763
  8. 70

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests70–
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 71 60
Dry 76 50
Wet 80 60
Snow 49 56
Comfort 75 64
Noise 69 69
Treadwear 64 72
Handling (owners) 77 63
Efficiency 70 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

± 8

Advan Sport AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 2Advan Sport ASΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 90% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 96% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 85% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 90% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/8 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 #5/5 2025 AutoView Ultra High Performance All-Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction and braking performance
  • Superior ride comfort and significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors or run-flats
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on high-powered or rear-wheel-drive vehicles
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a 'spongy' or 'jelly-like' feel during sharp, high-speed direction changes
  • Susceptible to sidewall bulging or cracking when encountering harsh potholes, especially in run-flat variants
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 review

Tire B Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Positive

The community generally regards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 as a high-performing tire that offers great wet weather handling, a comfortable ride, and low noise levels compared to stiffer alternatives like Bridgestone and Continental. Drivers frequently note that these tires transform vehicle handling dynamics, offering a softer yet responsive ride that makes harsh suspensions more manageable. While some users on higher-powered cars experience occasional wheel spin, the overall consensus highlights them as a top-tier choice receiving strong reviews and competitive pricing.

mustang6g.com ·2022-03-22

“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Top themes
#Wet weather performance#Ride comfort and smoothness#Low road noise#Handling and steering response#Value for money#Comparison with competitors

Based on 22 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available331
Rim diameters16″ – 21″17″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″11/32″
UTQG240 - 300 AA A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 76 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 80 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 80 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 76 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 56 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology