Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 1 road tests and 3,596 + 1,506 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 86–78

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
± 4

Tests 86 · 18 tests Owners 81 · 3,596 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
± 6

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,506 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 86

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 1 tests8577
    Reviews found online8790

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 86.9 = 86

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 90.2 = 83

  2. 90

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +13
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 1 tests9373
    Reviews found online8684

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 92.8 + 40% × 85.8 = 90

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 84 = 77

  3. 82

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests94≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7577

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 40% × 93.6 + 60% × 75.1 = 82

    Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 76.9 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 73 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 79

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests83≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7273

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 72.2 = 79

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 85

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2
    83
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Reviews found online8583
  7. 61

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests61–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Michelin Pilot Super Sport
Relative Score 86 78
Dry 86 83
Wet 90 77
Comfort 82 74
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 79 70
Handling (owners) 85 83
Efficiency 61 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

± 6

Pilot Super Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 5Pilot Super SportΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% #4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 95% #5/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/6 2021 Sportauto Summer Tire Test for Sportcars R19 #2/9 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Precise steering response and high-speed stability
  • Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
  • Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 review

Tire B Pilot Super Sport

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire

Cons

  • Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
  • Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
  • High price point compared to some alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Super Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Positive

Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.

Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing

Based on 13 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.

r/cars ·1 upvote ·2016-09-30

“The Michelin PSS are great tires. I am currently running Michelin (PS3s) on my sport bike. But a more budget-minded summer tire I like for a DD car is the Yokohama s.drive. I got over 26k miles out of my last set on an S5 (some twisties, but no track use). The s.drive is cheaper, quieter, and I believe a little lighter than the PSS. The s.drives do give up grip to the PSS, for sure, but that depends on how hard you push your car on the street, if you're going to be doing track driving with these tires, how much you like being able to break it loose, and the type of car these would be going on. For a car I want to regularly exercise on weekends, I'd go PSS. For a DD that just needs to feel better than it would on an A/S tire, the s.drive is a good balance.”

mbworld.org

“Another option would be Bridgestone RE-11 or Yokohama AD-08. Both have slightly more dry traction than the PSS. The big advantage of both of these in my experience is that they have a much stiffer sidewall than the PSS. The assists with response and much less roll over which on heavier cars (like the C63 or my current M3) makes a noticeable improvement. The downside is a slightly stiffer ride, especially on the AD-08. The RE-11 are only a slight trade off in comfort for the advantages noted above. Oh yeah, PSS have better tread wear too For street driving, the PSS are the best. If the car sees track time, I would personally lean towards RE-11. I ran both on my M3 and enjoyed the steering response and grip improvement of the RE-11 over the PSS but mainly because I get out several times a year to the track. When my C63 arrives, I will swap out the wheels (and use them for winter wheels), sell the OEM tires and put after market wheels and RE-11 tires on the car.”

r/BMW ·1 upvote ·2014-01-22

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Top themes
#Dry grip and cornering#Comparison to PS4S#Poor snow performance#Tread life and wear#High purchase price#Age and cracking issues#Daily driving comfort

Based on 364 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6450
Rim diameters17″ – 22″17″ – 23″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1919

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 77 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 79 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 74 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 86 vs 83 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Pilot Super Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Pilot Super Sport?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 90 vs 77 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Pilot Super Sport?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 86 vs 83 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Pilot Super Sport?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 82 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 or Pilot Super Sport?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 79 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology