Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 1 road tests and 1,898 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–71
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 94 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,898 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
Tests 77 · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 9 in Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 1 tests | 96 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 67 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.1 + 40% × 92.1 = 95
Ventus S2 AS: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 66.8 = 74
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 1 tests | 94 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 92 | 71 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 91.7 = 93
Ventus S2 AS: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 70.5 = 76
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 1 tests | 76 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 66 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 76.2 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
Ventus S2 AS: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 66.3 = 69
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 1 tests | 94 | 56 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 94 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83
Ventus S2 AS: 60% × 55.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 60
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or Ventus S2 AS. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests | 97 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 68 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 68.9 = 85
Ventus S2 AS: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S2 AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 90 | 67 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests | 72 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Hankook Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 71 |
| Dry | 95 | 74 |
| Wet | 93 | 76 |
| Comfort | 79 | 69 |
| Noise | 83 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 90 | 67 |
| Efficiency | 72 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Ventus S2 AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Ventus S2 AS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 100% #1/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 100% #1/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 60% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 96% #3/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #9/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 60% #5/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | 96% #4/9 · Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #2/9 Is Expensive Better? 2026 AutoView Korean All-Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with drivers praising its high performance, dry and wet road manners, competitive pricing, and overall capability as a daily and spirited driving tyre. Some users raise concerns regarding ride firmness, high-speed vibration issues, rapid wear under track conditions, and compromised grip in cold wet temperatures as noted in Scandinavian testing. Compatibility discussions also frequently centre on EV suitability, Porsche N-ratings, and rim protection markings.
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Based on 28 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | B · Hankook Ventus S2 AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 130 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 260 - 300 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Hankook Ventus S2 AS
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better noise, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Ventus S2 AS rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 83 vs 60 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 67 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 95 vs 74 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 93 vs 76 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 93 vs 76 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 95 vs 74 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 83 vs 60 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 85 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
