Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Laufenn S fit EQ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 4 road tests and 1,871 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 90–54

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
± 4

Tests 94 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,871 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”

Laufenn S fit EQ
Tire BLaufenn

S fit EQ

Summer

± 9

Tests 53 · 4 tests Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 14 in 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 95

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +44
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 3 tests9649
    Reviews found online9254

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.1 + 40% × 92.1 = 95

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.9 + 40% × 53.9 = 51

  2. 93

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +44
    49
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 31 / 3 tests9446
    Reviews found online9254

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 91.7 = 93

    S fit EQ: 60% × 46 + 40% × 53.9 = 49

  3. 79

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +20
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests76≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8154

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 76.2 + 60% × 81.3 = 79

    S fit EQ: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for S fit EQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 83

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +27
    56
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 1 tests9449
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 94 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83

    S fit EQ: 60% × 48.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 86

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +25
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 1 tests9764
    Reviews found online6956

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.5 + 40% × 69.1 = 86

    S fit EQ: 60% × 64 + 40% × 55.8 = 61

  6. 90

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +43
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Reviews found online9047
  7. 72

    Efficiency

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQ
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 1 tests7271
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Laufenn S fit EQ: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6Laufenn S fit EQ
Relative Score 90 54
Dry 95 51
Wet 93 49
Comfort 79 59
Noise 83 56
Treadwear 86 61
Handling (owners) 90 47
Efficiency 72 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

± 9

S fit EQ

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEagle F1 Asymmetric 6S fit EQΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 95% #13/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 91% #35/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 89% #8/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 92% #9/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 92% #7/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? 77% #42/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #4/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 95% #5/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 92% #14/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 99% #2/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 77% #10/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 89% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? #12/10 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip with predictable, progressive behavior at the limit
  • Significantly lower road noise and improved ride comfort compared to run-flats and predecessors
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and agile turn-in response

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or short lifespan reported by some aggressive drivers
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a slightly squishy or floaty feeling during hard, high-speed cornering
  • Occasional complaints about loud resonance or road noise on rough or concrete asphalt surfaces
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 review

Tire B S fit EQ

Pros

  • Attractive price point offering high value for money
  • Low road noise resulting in a quiet, comfortable ride for daily commuting
  • Competent dry grip and handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Flimsy sidewalls prone to bubbling and easy puncture from potholes
  • Poor wet weather performance with tendencies toward understeer and traction loss
  • Lack of steering feedback and poor turn-in response
All owner themes in the S fit EQ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Positive

Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with drivers praising its high performance, dry and wet road manners, competitive pricing, and overall capability as a daily and spirited driving tyre. Some users raise concerns regarding ride firmness, high-speed vibration issues, rapid wear under track conditions, and compromised grip in cold wet temperatures as noted in Scandinavian testing. Compatibility discussions also frequently centre on EV suitability, Porsche N-ratings, and rim protection markings.

Top themes
#Wet and dry performance#Comparison with Michelin#Ride comfort and noise#Wear and durability#EV readiness and fitment#Value and pricing

Based on 28 community posts

Tire B

Laufenn S fit EQ

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 B · Laufenn S fit EQ
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13024
Rim diameters17″ – 23″15″ – 20″
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG260 - 300 AA A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Laufenn S fit EQ

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 95 vs 51 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 93 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 90 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 83 vs 56 on noise.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Tire B · Laufenn S fit EQ

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 93 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 95 vs 51 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 83 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or S fit EQ?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology