Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 30 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 vs Kumho Ecsta KU31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 30 + 165 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Directional 5 is ahead, 73–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 165 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Eagle F1 Directional 5 +667Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Directional 5 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 76 67 Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 73
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Eagle F1 Directional 5 +570Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Directional 5 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 77 69 Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 75
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Eagle F1 Directional 5 +465Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Directional 5 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 63 Eagle F1 Directional 5: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
Ecsta KU31: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Directional 5 +463Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Directional 5 Ecsta KU31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 61 Eagle F1 Directional 5: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Ecsta KU31: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Directional 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Directional 5 +1167Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Directional 5 Ecsta KU31 Reviews found online 78 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 | Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 67 |
| Dry | 73 | 67 |
| Wet | 75 | 70 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Eagle F1 Directional 5
Ecsta KU31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Directional 5
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip, often inspiring confidence in wet conditions
- High value for money and lower price point compared to premium alternatives
- Strong steering response and exceptional road feedback/feel
Cons
- Soft sidewalls reported by several users, which can affect heavier vehicles or require higher PSI
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality noted by some drivers
- Can feel slightly 'greasy' or lose peak performance during prolonged hard driving
Tire B Ecsta KU31
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet weather handling
- Progressive and predictable feedback at the limit
Cons
- Increased road noise and potential 'droning' as tread wears
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feel for some drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5
Kumho Ecsta KU31
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 78 vs 67 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Directional 5 or Ecsta KU31?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Directional 5 or Ecsta KU31?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Directional 5 or Ecsta KU31?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Directional 5 or Ecsta KU31?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Directional 5 or Ecsta KU31?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Directional 5, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology