Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle LS-2 vs Michelin Premier A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 148 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Premier A/S leads, 61–57 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle LS-2

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 148 reviews

Michelin Premier A/S
Tire BMichelin

Premier A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Premier A/S +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4962

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    Premier A/S: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Premier A/S +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5767

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    Premier A/S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Eagle LS-2 +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5352

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    Premier A/S: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Premier A/S +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5258

    Eagle LS-2: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    Premier A/S: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Eagle LS-2 +8
    47
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online4834

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    Premier A/S: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Premier A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Premier A/S +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceEagle LS-2Premier A/S
    Reviews found online4960
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle LS-2 vs Michelin Premier A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle LS-2Michelin Premier A/S
Relative Score 57 61
Dry 55 64
Wet 61 68
Snow 60 59
Comfort 57 61
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 55 47
Handling (owners) 49 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Eagle LS-2

± 8

Premier A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Tire B Premier A/S

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
  • Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
  • Good center-line tracking and steering feedback

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and premature wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
  • Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Premier A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle LS-2 B · Michelin Premier A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG360 - 400 A A - B640 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Michelin Premier A/S

Narrow edge: Michelin Premier A/S — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Goodyear Eagle LS-2 if treadwear matters most to you. Michelin Premier A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Premier A/S scores 60 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Premier A/S scores 64 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle LS-2 scores 55 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Premier A/S scores 68 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire B · Michelin Premier A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Michelin Premier A/S, 68 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Michelin Premier A/S, 64 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Michelin Premier A/S, 61 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle LS-2 or Premier A/S?

Goodyear Eagle LS-2, 55 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology