Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle Touring vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 45 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk AS is ahead, 69–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire BFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +20
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4071

    Eagle Touring: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Eagle Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Firehawk AS +18
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4368

    Eagle Touring: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.3 = 51

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Eagle Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Firehawk AS +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4363

    Eagle Touring: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 43.4 = 55

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Eagle Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 47

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +22
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3769

    Eagle Touring: 40% × 62.3 (est.) + 60% × 37.3 = 47

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 59

    Noise

    Firehawk AS +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4774

    Eagle Touring: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 59

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 45

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +25
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3272

    Eagle Touring: 60% × 54.2 (est.) + 40% × 32.2 = 45

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 35

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk AS +32
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle TouringFirehawk AS
    Reviews found online3567
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle Touring vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle TouringFirestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 50 69
Dry 50 70
Wet 51 69
Snow 55 66
Comfort 47 69
Noise 59 69
Treadwear 45 70
Handling (owners) 35 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Eagle Touring

± 8

Firehawk AS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle Touring

Pros

  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Competitive price point and value
  • Reliable performance in dry, fair-weather conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and handling in wet or snowy conditions
  • Difficulty maintaining balance
All owner themes in the Eagle Touring review

Tire B Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle Touring B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available305
Rim diameters18″ – 24″15″ – 18″
Tread depth8 - 12/32″11/32″
UTQG350 - 560 A A480 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated BandBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle Touring

Firestone Firehawk AS

Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 67 vs 35 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 47 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 50 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle Touring
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 66 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 47 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle Touring or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology