Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 5 reviews
Goodyear Eagle Vector looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear Eagle Vector vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Eagle Vector and BluEarth Es ES32 are level at 71.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +170Why this score
Source Eagle Vector BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 71 Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
74
Wet
Level74Why this score
Source Eagle Vector BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 75 75 Eagle Vector: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +373Why this score
Source Eagle Vector BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 75 Eagle Vector: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Eagle Vector +565Why this score
Source Eagle Vector BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
74
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +175Why this score
Source Eagle Vector BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 74 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle Vector | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 70 |
| Wet | 74 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Eagle Vector
71
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle Vector
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Reliable traction in light to moderate snow
Cons
- Performance in heavy snow is limited compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread wear can be uneven when comparing front and rear axle longevity
- Handling characteristics may feel less sharp than dedicated summer performance tires
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle Vector | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle Vector
71
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle Vector and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle Vector is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on comfort. Goodyear Eagle Vector rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Eagle Vector scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle Vector
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?
Goodyear Eagle Vector, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology