tirewheelguide

Goodyear Eagle Vector looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle Vector vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Eagle Vector 71, BluEarth Es ES32 72.

Check price on Amazon · Eagle Vector Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle Vector
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle Vector

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6973

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7076

    Eagle Vector: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.6 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 70

    Treadwear

    Eagle Vector +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7376
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle VectorYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 71 72
Dry 68 71
Wet 74 75
Comfort 70 73
Treadwear 70 67
Handling (owners) 73 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle Vector

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle Vector

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Reliable traction in light to moderate snow

Cons

  • Performance in heavy snow is limited compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread wear can be uneven when comparing front and rear axle longevity
  • Handling characteristics may feel less sharp than dedicated summer performance tires
All owner themes in the Eagle Vector review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle Vector B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle Vector

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle Vector and Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle Vector is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is stronger on dry and comfort. Goodyear Eagle Vector rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Eagle Vector scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle Vector
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle Vector or BluEarth Es ES32?

Goodyear Eagle Vector, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology