Goodyear Eagle Vector looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle Vector vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 5 + 2,588 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle Vector
Tire AGoodyear

Eagle Vector

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 5 reviews

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,588 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +19
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 68 (est.)86
    Reviews found online6988

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +10
    84
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 73 (est.)84
    Reviews found online7585

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.6 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–97
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 80.1 = 90

  4. 70

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +15
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7088

    Eagle Vector: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.5 = 85

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–82
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7273

    Eagle Vector: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Vector. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +16
    89
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online7389
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    87
    Why this score
    SourceEagle VectorCrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–87
Scores at a glance
Goodyear Eagle Vector vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle VectorMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 71 83
Dry 68 87
Wet 74 84
Snow – 90
Comfort 70 85
Noise – 76
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) 73 89
Efficiency – 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle Vector

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle Vector

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Reliable traction in light to moderate snow

Cons

  • Performance in heavy snow is limited compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread wear can be uneven when comparing front and rear axle longevity
  • Handling characteristics may feel less sharp than dedicated summer performance tires
All owner themes in the Eagle Vector review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear Eagle Vector

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-11-12

“I just bought Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV for my Range Rover Sport and the reason is that I needed/wanted 3PMS certification. Also in my driving career I’ve always found Michelin better for everyday use compared to Pirelli which I instead preferred for performance and weekend fun.”

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2023-10-09

“Michelin Cross Climate 2 vs 2 SUV Hi I am looking at new tyres and am pretty convinced to go for the Michelin Cross Climates, but I am confused by the Cross Climate 2 vs the Cross Climate 2 SUV; they seem the same tyre, albeit the non-SUV version has better fuel economy, according to the EU Label system. I asked Michelin, but their response was meaningless: they just listed the same bullet points for each. Can anyone advise the difference, and do I need the SUV version? One car for these is a 2023 Skoda Kodiaq 2.0L TSI190 4x4 (well, the Volkswagen version of 4x4), tyre size 235/50/19. The other car is a 2019 Kia Sportage, which needs 225/60/17; in this car's case, it is just the non-SUV version available despite both cars being SUVs and of similar weights, albeit this car is a 1.6L 130hp. As a family, we have used winter tyres in the past, but since changing cars this year, we are thinking of switching to all seasons as we think they will suit us perfectly rather than switching tyres every April and November. Live in Lincolnshire. So we get all weathers ranging from -10 through to +35. Thanks for any and all advice. Paul Read more”

mbworld.org

“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”

Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle Vector B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle Vector

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better dry, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Eagle Vector rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 70 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 74 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle Vector
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle Vector or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle Vector or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle Vector or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle Vector or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle Vector or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology