Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 25 + 14 road tests and 5,956 + 8,191 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance 2 or Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score
84
68
Dry
81
75
Wet
82
85
Comfort
80
69
Noise
75
36
Treadwear
94
52
Handling (owners)
81
73
Efficiency
90
48
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
± 4
EfficientGrip Performance 2
68
/ 100
± 6
Ecsta PS71
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
EfficientGrip Performance 2
Ecsta PS71
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry
Dry
97%#4/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16
87%#10/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Dry Braking
Dry
93%#12/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
95%#9/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
99%#4/6 · 2025 AMS Sustainability Tyre Test
98%#12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
96%#2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
92%#2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning
Wet
80%#9/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
86%#6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
95%#11/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet
Wet
96%#5/8 · 2022 Al Volante Summer Tire Test R16
94%#4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
96%#4/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout
–
Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete)
Wet
85%#6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
95%#5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
99%#2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
99%#5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
97%#3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
88%#2/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17
89%#4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
93%#2/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
94%#10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Exterior Noise
Noise
71%#7/6 · 2024 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ Summer Tire Test R17
43%#10/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
99%#3/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
97%#17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Abrasion
Treadwear
87%#2/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
51%#14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Wear
Treadwear
100%#1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
50%#14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Fuel Consumption
Efficiency
98%#4/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
93%#17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
100%#1/10 · 2026 autozurnal Eco Summer Tyre Test
83%#15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price
Cost
57%#13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
83%#6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Cost
#1/202024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
#7/202025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Value
Cost
73%#2/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
37%#11/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#3/162026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
#4/522025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A EfficientGrip Performance 2
Pros
Exceptional tread longevity and mileage capability
Quiet operation and high cabin comfort
Strong grip and predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
Soft sidewalls can cause steering vagueness or body roll during aggressive cornering
Some users report increased tire noise or resonance as the tread wears down
Occasional complaints regarding weaker wet braking or traction compared to dedicated sports tires
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Positive
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is largely positive, with users frequently praising its exceptional wet performance, high durability, and overall comfort. Some users note that its soft sidewalls can make it feel less sharp during spirited cornering, but it remains a top choice for efficiency, braking, and longevity.
#Wet performance and braking#High durability and longevity#Soft sidewalls and cornering handling#Comfort and low rolling resistance#Comparison with Michelin Primacy
Based on 9 community posts
Tire B
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Positive
Community members generally view the Kumho Ecsta PS71 as a capable and reliable mid-range ultra-high performance tire offering solid grip and value for money compared to premium alternatives. While perceived as good once warmed up, some drivers note that it does not quite reach the ultimate grip level of top-tier brands and question its tread wear longevity.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology