Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 14 road tests and 16,807 + 8,175 owner reviews. How we score

EfficientGrip Performance is ahead, 73–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
± 8

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 72 · 16,807 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I've just had these fitted too and have to say they seem much quieter than my Kumhos and certainly dry grip is excellent ( though I don't tend to drift round corners, unless something has gone wrong!)”

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 6

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,175 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 78

    Dry

    EfficientGrip Performance +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 12 tests8078
    Reviews found online7572

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.9 + 40% × 74.6 = 78

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 75

  2. 79

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +6
    85
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests7992
    Reviews found online7975

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 78.6 = 79

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 85

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests6175
    Reviews found online7566

    EfficientGrip Performance: 40% × 61 + 60% × 74.8 = 69

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 75.3 + 60% × 65.8 = 70

  4. 69

    Noise

    EfficientGrip Performance +33
    36
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 8 tests7115
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 69

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 64

    Treadwear

    EfficientGrip Performance +13
    51
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests6445
    Reviews found online6361

    EfficientGrip Performance: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 63.3 = 64

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 60.6 = 51

  6. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Reviews found online7273
  7. 79

    Efficiency

    EfficientGrip Performance +31
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 7 tests7948
Scores at a glance
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear EfficientGrip PerformanceKumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 73 68
Dry 78 75
Wet 79 85
Comfort 69 70
Noise 69 36
Treadwear 64 51
Handling (owners) 72 73
Efficiency 79 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

EfficientGrip Performance

± 6

Ecsta PS71

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEfficientGrip PerformanceEcsta PS71ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #5/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 95% #9/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 98% #12/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 89% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 92% #2/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 99% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 98% #4/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #2/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% #1/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 89% #4/9 · 2023 ACE/ARBÖ/GTÜ 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #9/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 94% #10/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #7/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 97% #17/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 70% #15/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 50% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 97% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 83% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #4/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test 83% #6/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #9/20 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test #7/20 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 56% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test 37% #11/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/8 2023 Autoklub ČR Premium Summer Tire Test R16 #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EfficientGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth driving dynamics
  • Significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors
  • Strong wet and dry weather traction with great aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and a 'squishy' or vague steering feel during spirited cornering
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some drivers
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage, bulging, or punctures from potholes
All owner themes in the EfficientGrip Performance review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance is generally favorable, with drivers highlighting quiet road noise, good comfort, and solid wet and dry grip. Some users raise concerns regarding sidewall vulnerability and potential long-term cracking, while others inquire about variations in tread patterns.

Top themes
#low road noise#wet braking performance#dry grip and handling#sidewall durability concerns#comfort and efficiency#tread pattern variations

Based on 22 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available52133
Rim diameters14″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallRaised Black Lettering - Serrated Black LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance — better noise, efficiency and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if wet matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 69 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 79 vs 48 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance scores 64 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 79 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 79 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 78 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 69 vs 36 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 64 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, EfficientGrip Performance or Ecsta PS71?

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance, 79 vs 48 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology