Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 1,727 reviews
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear EfficientGrip vs Nexen N Blue ECO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,727 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–60
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
N Blue ECO +766Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 54 66 EfficientGrip: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 59
N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
No road tests of dry for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
N Blue ECO +569Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 62 69 EfficientGrip: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 66 – EfficientGrip: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 67
No road tests of snow for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
63
Comfort
N Blue ECO +366Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 63 EfficientGrip: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63
N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – EfficientGrip: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 58
No road tests of noise for EfficientGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Level60Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 56 56 EfficientGrip: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for EfficientGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
50
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +1666Why this score
Source EfficientGrip N Blue ECO Reviews found online 50 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear EfficientGrip | Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 66 |
| Dry | 59 | 66 |
| Wet | 64 | 69 |
| Snow | 67 | – |
| Comfort | 63 | 66 |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 60 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
EfficientGrip
66
/ 100
N Blue ECO
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | EfficientGrip | N Blue ECO | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/14 2012 ACE Touring Summer Tyre Test | #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A EfficientGrip
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Good fuel economy and rolling resistance
- Reliable wet and dry grip for everyday driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls result in a mushy or 'jelly-like' steering feel during cornering
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage, bulges, and punctures from road hazards
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users
Tire B N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Goodyear EfficientGrip
Community opinion on the Goodyear EfficientGrip family is mixed, with users frequently praising its high tread life, comfort, and solid wet braking compared to rivals. However, several drivers express concerns regarding soft sidewalls prone to pothole damage, vague handling dynamics during spirited driving, and disappointing cold or wet traction when used out of season. Many discussions also center on comparing it against alternative touring tires like Michelin Primacy and Continental PremiumContact.
bmwfanatics.co.za
·2025-11-20
“Hi Llew! Currently running Pirelli Cinturato P7 Run Flats. I don't do a lot of long-distance driving anymore, so I am fine with not having a sporty feel, but I wouldn't mind trying that out, being new to BMWs. So the Khumos apparently are a better fit for that. I ran the three 3 choices (Khumo, GY, Pirelli) through chat for a comparison, and it spat out that the Goodyear EfficientGrip is a very "compelling" tyre and the better choice. Not sure what to make of that.”
r/ex30
·3 upvotes ·2025-10-29
“Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance SUV are summer tires, not all season tires, I believe.”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-06-16
“Hankook ventus prime 4 VS Goodyear efficientgrip performance 2 I cannot decide between these two tires for ages now. Customer reviews seem all over the place. I drive a tuned volkswagen polo mk6 2020. I need something that inspires confidence for spirited driving in corners with good stability, mainly dry handling and braking but also relatively comfortable. So far I've learned that the goodyear is more comfortable, better in the wet, better at braking but extremely lousy in handling because of the soft sidewalls. Can someone that has used the EGP2 confirm those claims or are they exaggerating. Base spec polos are known for a harsh ride and I live in the balkans. The roads are full of potholes and sometimes you can't even drive around them. specs: 195/55R16 87V”
Top themes
#tread life and longevity#soft sidewall damage#wet and winter grip#comfort vs sporty handling#summer touring tire comparisons#tread cracking and chipping
Based on 21 community posts
Tire B
Nexen N Blue ECO
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear EfficientGrip | B · Nexen N Blue ECO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 13″ – 16″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Goodyear EfficientGrip
66
/ 100
Nexen N Blue ECO
Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 63 on comfort.
Tire A · Goodyear EfficientGrip
Tire B · Nexen N Blue ECO
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO?
Which is better in the wet, EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, EfficientGrip or N Blue ECO?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology