Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 3 + 5 road tests and 4 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i*pike RS2 is ahead, 71–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Tire BHankook

Winter i*pike RS2

Winter

Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 76 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests7349
    Reviews found online4274
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–093%90%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–080%60%

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.4 + 40% × 73.8 = 59

  2. 65

    Wet

    Winter i*pike RS2 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests7471
    Reviews found online5278
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%92%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%99%

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 78.2 = 74

  3. 72

    Snow

    Winter i*pike RS2 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests7476
    Reviews found online6877
    Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–080%79%
    Ice Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–191%93%
    Ice Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–182%84%
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–093%92%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–194%95%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 77.1 = 76

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Winter i*pike RS2 +23
    78
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)81
    Reviews found online4175

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 75.2 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–55
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.8 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Winter i*pike RS2 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4575

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54

    Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i*pike RS2 +30
    79
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2
    Reviews found online4979
Scores at a glance
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip Ice ArcticHankook Winter i*pike RS2
Relative Score 62 71
Dry 60 59
Wet 65 74
Snow 72 76
Comfort 55 78
Noise – 60
Treadwear 54 71
Handling (owners) 49 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Winter i*pike RS2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic finished ahead 0 times and Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryUltraGrip Ice ArcticWinter i*pike RS2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 90% +3.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% 60% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% 100% −2.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 97% 92% +4.9 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Wet Handling Wet 99% 99% +0.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Ice Braking Snow 80% 79% +0.8 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Ice Handling Snow 91% 93% −1.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Ice Traction Snow 82% 84% −1.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Braking Snow 93% 92% +0.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Handling Snow 94% 95% −1.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Snow Traction Snow 96% 95% +1.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #6/8 #5/8 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling on packed snow
  • Strong performance on ice during the first two seasons
  • Reliable winter grip in extreme arctic conditions

Cons

  • Significant stud loss after two seasons of use
  • Abrupt and dangerous decline in grip performance by the third year
  • Poor longevity relative to competitors despite remaining tread depth
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Ice Arctic review

Tire B Winter i*pike RS2

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
  • Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
  • High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years

Cons

  • Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
  • Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i*pike RS2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

Winner: Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Where the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 79 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 78 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 74 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 76 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 78 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Winter i*pike RS2?

Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology