Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Kumho Road Venture 798 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Kumho Road Venture 798 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 4 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Road Venture 798 leads, 62–59 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Kumho Road Venture 798
Tire BKumho

Road Venture 798

All Season Touring tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Level
    60
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests73≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online4256

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60

    Road Venture 798: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Road Venture 798. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5259

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65

    Road Venture 798: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Road Venture 798. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online68–

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Road Venture 798 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4158

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55

    Road Venture 798: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Treadwear

    Road Venture 798 +12
    66
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4567

    UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54

    Road Venture 798: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture 798. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Road Venture 798 +5
    54
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Ice ArcticRoad Venture 798
    Reviews found online4954
Scores at a glance
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic vs Kumho Road Venture 798: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip Ice ArcticKumho Road Venture 798
Relative Score 59 62
Dry 60 60
Wet 65 62
Snow 72 –
Comfort 55 64
Treadwear 54 66
Handling (owners) 49 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Road Venture 798

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Pros

  • Excellent traction and handling on packed snow
  • Strong performance on ice during the first two seasons
  • Reliable winter grip in extreme arctic conditions

Cons

  • Significant stud loss after two seasons of use
  • Abrupt and dangerous decline in grip performance by the third year
  • Poor longevity relative to competitors despite remaining tread depth
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Ice Arctic review

Tire B Road Venture 798

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and mileage, with multiple users reporting between 30,000 to over 54,000 miles
  • Strong dry traction and commendable performance in snow
  • Low road noise levels when relatively fresh

Cons

  • Uneven tread wear reported by some users over time
  • Signs of cracking around the tread blocks as the tires age
  • Noticeable degradation in wet grip and increased noise as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the Road Venture 798 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic B · Kumho Road Venture 798
CategoryWinterAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic

Kumho Road Venture 798

Narrow edge: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better treadwear and comfort. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic if wet matters most to you. Kumho Road Venture 798 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 64 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic scores 65 vs 62 on wet.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture 798

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798?

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, 65 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798?

Kumho Road Venture 798, 64 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip Ice Arctic or Road Venture 798?

Kumho Road Venture 798, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology