Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Kumho WinterCraft WS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 1 road tests and 20 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

UltraGrip Performance+ is ahead, 80–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
± 4

Tests 78 · 11 tests Owners 80 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    UltraGrip Performance+ +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests71≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7463

    UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 73.8 = 72

    WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    No road tests of dry for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 86

    Wet

    UltraGrip Performance+ +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 1 tests8773
    Reviews found online8465
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%85%

    UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 83.7 = 86

    WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 65.3 = 70

  3. 84

    Snow

    UltraGrip Performance+ +26
    58
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 1 tests8751
    Reviews found online7969
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%87%

    UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 79 = 84

    WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 51.2 + 40% × 68.6 = 58

  4. 77

    Comfort

    UltraGrip Performance+ +12
    65
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8163

    UltraGrip Performance+: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 80.6 = 77

    WinterCraft WS71: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.6 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests55–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60

    No owner ratings of noise for UltraGrip Performance+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    UltraGrip Performance+ +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests74≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8260

    UltraGrip Performance+: 60% × 74 + 40% × 81.5 = 77

    WinterCraft WS71: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for WinterCraft WS71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    UltraGrip Performance+ +17
    64
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Reviews found online8164
  8. 77

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests77–
Scores at a glance
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ vs Kumho WinterCraft WS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip Performance+Kumho WinterCraft WS71
Relative Score 80 64
Dry 72 65
Wet 86 70
Snow 84 58
Comfort 77 65
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 77 62
Handling (owners) 81 64
Efficiency 77 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

UltraGrip Performance+

± 8

WinterCraft WS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ finished ahead 1 times and Kumho WinterCraft WS71 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryUltraGrip Performance+WinterCraft WS71ΔHead-to-head
Wet Braking Wet 88% 85% +3.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Snow Braking Snow 98% 87% +11.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/48 #28/48 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip Performance+

Pros

  • Strong wet grip and resistance to aquaplaning, with several owners reporting confident cornering and no sliding in the rain
  • Excellent snow traction, including deep snow, steep slopes, and cold temperatures down to about -30°C, with one owner describing the best lateral grip on snow they have experienced
  • Sporty, stable handling for a winter tire, with good dry-road behavior and the ability to withstand spirited driving

Cons

  • Noise is a concern for some owners, who describe a roar or sizzling on fast curves and a noisy ride in a BMW 3 Series
  • Ice grip is mixed: one reviewer called it unsuitable for ice and another noted some slipping, though others found it adequate or very capable on icy slopes
  • Less grip and sharpness than summer tires in dry and wet conditions, with one reviewer reporting unpredictable cornering and heavy understeer
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Performance+ review

Tire B WinterCraft WS71

Pros

  • Excellent traction in snow and slush
  • Strong performance in extreme cold temperatures
  • Good value for the price point

Cons

  • Reports of sidewall cracking or splitting after multiple seasons
  • Functional limitations typical of dedicated winter compounds on dry pavement
  • Potential for premature structural degradation
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WS71 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ B · Kumho WinterCraft WS71
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available8868
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Sizes in common2222

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+

Kumho WinterCraft WS71

Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 84 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 81 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 86 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ scores 77 vs 62 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 86 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 72 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 84 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 77 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip Performance+ or WinterCraft WS71?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, 77 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology