Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance vs Vredestein Snowtrac 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 34 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: UltraGrip Performance and Snowtrac 3 are level at 76.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    UltraGrip Performance +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8076

    UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 76

    Snowtrac 3: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Snowtrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Snowtrac 3 +2
    82
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 79 (est.)
    Reviews found online8386

    UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 77.7 (est.) + 40% × 83.3 = 80

    Snowtrac 3: 60% × 79.2 (est.) + 40% × 86.1 = 82

    No road tests of wet for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Snowtrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    UltraGrip Performance +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8075

    UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 76

    Snowtrac 3: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74

    No road tests of snow for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Snowtrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    Snowtrac 3 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7579

    UltraGrip Performance: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.4 = 73

    Snowtrac 3: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Treadwear

    Snowtrac 3 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7376

    UltraGrip Performance: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    Snowtrac 3: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Performance. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Snowtrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    UltraGrip Performance +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceUltraGrip PerformanceSnowtrac 3
    Reviews found online8175
Scores at a glance
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance vs Vredestein Snowtrac 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear UltraGrip PerformanceVredestein Snowtrac 3
Relative Score 76 76
Dry 76 73
Wet 80 82
Snow 76 74
Comfort 73 75
Treadwear 70 72
Handling (owners) 81 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

UltraGrip Performance

± 8

Snowtrac 3

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A UltraGrip Performance

Pros

  • Exceptional snow and ice traction
  • Strong performance in wet and dry conditions
  • High tread longevity and durability

Cons

  • Increased road noise in warmer conditions
  • Slightly higher fuel consumption
  • Limited performance on pure ice surfaces
All owner themes in the UltraGrip Performance review

Tire B Snowtrac 3

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and control in deep snow, slush, and on icy surfaces.
  • High level of driver confidence and predictable handling in adverse weather.
  • Strong wet-weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.

Cons

  • Noticeable tread movement or 'spongy' feel in dry, warm conditions.
  • Reduced cornering stability in dry weather compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Slightly firmer ride quality noted by some users.
All owner themes in the Snowtrac 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance B · Vredestein Snowtrac 3
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance

Vredestein Snowtrac 3

Too close to call: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance and Vredestein Snowtrac 3 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance is stronger on handling and dry. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 81 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance scores 76 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Goodyear UltraGrip Performance
Tire B · Vredestein Snowtrac 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Which is better in the wet, UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 82 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance, 76 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 74 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, UltraGrip Performance or Snowtrac 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology