Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 79 reviews
GT Radial Adventuro AT3 vs General Grabber APT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 79 + 82 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber APT is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 82 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Grabber APT +267Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 67 Adventuro AT3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Grabber APT: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
No road tests of dry for Adventuro AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
66
Wet
Grabber APT +874Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 64 76 Adventuro AT3: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
Grabber APT: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
No road tests of wet for Adventuro AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
Grabber APT +267Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 65 Adventuro AT3: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 65
Grabber APT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
No road tests of snow for Adventuro AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
57
Comfort
Grabber APT +764Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 52 61 Adventuro AT3: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.5 = 57
Grabber APT: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
Adventuro AT3 +461Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 53 Adventuro AT3: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
Grabber APT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 61
No road tests of noise for Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
52
Treadwear
Grabber APT +1870Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 44 71 Reviews found online 63 69 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 40% 60% Adventuro AT3: 60% × 44.4 + 40% × 63.2 = 52
Grabber APT: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 70
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison58Why this score
Source Adventuro AT3 Grabber APT Reviews found online – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | GT Radial Adventuro AT3 | General Grabber APT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 69 |
| Dry | 65 | 67 |
| Wet | 66 | 74 |
| Snow | 65 | 67 |
| Comfort | 57 | 64 |
| Noise | 65 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Adventuro AT3
Grabber APT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, GT Radial Adventuro AT3 finished ahead 0 times and General Grabber APT 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Adventuro AT3 | Grabber APT | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 40% | 60% | −20.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/18 | #6/18 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Adventuro AT3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Grabber APT
Pros
- Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
- Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance
Cons
- Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · GT Radial Adventuro AT3 | B · General Grabber APT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 25 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 16/32″ | 12 - 16/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 740 A - AA A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 80 psi | 44 - 90 psi |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
GT Radial Adventuro AT3
General Grabber APT
Winner: General Grabber APT — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the GT Radial Adventuro AT3 if noise matters most to you.
General Grabber APT scores 70 vs 52 on treadwear.
General Grabber APT scores 74 vs 66 on wet.
General Grabber APT scores 64 vs 57 on comfort.
GT Radial Adventuro AT3 scores 65 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
Which is better in the wet, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
General Grabber APT, 74 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
GT Radial Adventuro AT3, 65 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
General Grabber APT, 64 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Adventuro AT3 or Grabber APT?
General Grabber APT, 70 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology